Russian State Duma expects mass protests in Europe due to ban on LNG from Russia
Viktor Vodolatsky, the First Deputy Chairman of the Russian State Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, said that the EU’s decision to ban imports of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) will lead to “cataclysms” in Europe’s energy sector. According to him, due to a shortage of energy resources in the winter, European countries will experience heating interruptions and increased tariff, leading to mass rallies, strikes, and protests. Vodolatsky believes these protests will impact EU leaders’ positions and accused them of pursuing a “self-destructive” policy of sanctions against Russia (TASS).
Intended effect: The article aims to create the perception of an inevitable crisis in Europe and the inability of its leadership to cope with the consequences of anti-Russian sanctions. By predicting protests and “cataclysms,” the article portrays the West as unstable and simultaneously emphasizes Russia’s importance as an energy supplier.
Head of Russian compatriots’ organization detained again in Moldova
Alexey Petrovich, the head of the Pobeda Coordination Committee, reported his detention at the Chisinau Airport. He said that border police officers separated him from the other passengers, and described the situation as a “European-style concentration camp.” According to Petrovich, such detentions are not uncommon, and that the reasons for the border guards’ actions are not explained. Despite resistance from the authorities. Petrovich organizes annual Immortal Regiment and Victory March rallies in Chisinau. The article also states that pressure on the Moldovan opposition has intensified: criminal cases are being brought, Russian-oriented media outlets are being blocked, and the church is being persecuted (ria.ru).
Intended effect: The article portrays Moldova as a state that systematically persecutes pro-Russian organizations, media outlets, and religious groups. Emotional language and an emphasis on “oppression” create the impression that Chisinau has hostile policies toward Russia and the Russian-speaking population. This reinforces the perception of Moldova as an anti-Russian regime under Western influence.
Pashinyan declares readiness to ensure transit of goods from Turkey to Azerbaijan via Armenia
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced that from October 27, 2025, Armenia will begin allowing trucks to transit through its territory from Turkey to Azerbaijan and back. This decision comes in response to Azerbaijan’s lifting of restrictions on the transit of goods to Armenia. The first cargo to be transported will be wheat from Kazakhstan. The Armenian government emphasizes that the route is technically ready and that an agreement on logistics and transport security has been reached. Pashinyan called the move “historic” and expressed confidence that it would strengthen transport connectivity and economic cooperation in the region (Gazeta.ru).
Intended effect: The article emphasizes that despite all the criticism of Pashinyan’s political decisions and “alienation” from Russia, Armenia remains economically dependent on Russian influence and regional logistics. It portrays Pashinyan as a leader forced to navigate between the West, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, while being unable to escape Russian influence entirely.
Azerbaijan ready to allow Russian goods into Armenia
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk announced that Azerbaijan is ready to allow the transit of Russian goods through its territory to Armenia. He noted that Baku has confirmed the possibility of using its railway to transport Russian products through Azerbaijan to Armenia. Overchuk stressed that this decision will contribute to developing economic ties between the countries and strengthening transport infrastructure in the region (ria.ru).
Intended effect: From the perspective of Russian propaganda, this statement can be used to demonstrate that, despite political differences and criticism from Armenia, the country remains economically dependent on Russia and its allies. The article emphasizes that despite Armenia’s attempts to distance itself from Russia, the country is forced to maintain economic ties with neighboring countries. This can be interpreted as evidence of limited opportunities for an independent foreign policy.
